Camille Berriman - the source that wasn't.

An interesting and timely article was published by The Independent this morning.

The head of Uber suggested that if the background of reporters were uncovered, you will always find the reason they lie. Of course it didn't really make the news until Ashton Kutcher agreed and Tweeted on it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/ashton-kutcher-backs-uber-execs-call-to-expose-lives-of-female-reporters-what-is-so-wrong-about-digging-up-dirt-on-shady-journalist-9872418.html

  Which brings us to the point. On November 17, 2014 there was a sudden barrage of press releases sent to thousands of news outlets all over the world. Apparently the opinion of a Bury St Edmunds woman named Camille Berriman was the push that "proves" the allegation of Scott Rogers' involvement in pedophilia are true and was worthy of a media blitz.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/slain-tv-host-turned-scandalous-past-26975327

   Now Camille, our source for the story, claims she was a student of the Suffolk Academy of Dance and Performing Arts when Mr Rogers was a teacher, but admits she has no first hand knowledge of pedophilia activity, nor was she a witness to any, but she now feels that after all the press coverage in Bury St Edmund's paper, the Bury Free Press, that he MUST be guilty.  

   Do you know why this statement from Camille Berriman is especially shocking? ....Because she an editor at The Bury Free Press.

There's more:

She's also one of the reporters who wrote the articles about the Scott Rogers/Hodgkinson murder. She also has clout when it comes to preferred publication of "letters to the editor" in the Bury Free Press, she is the editor and she also writes the letters under the name Camille Ives. Source -> Reporter -> Editor -> Publisher -> and fawning Public, this shady lady has it covered. Oh yes, she's also an actress and dancer. (Google it)

So you see this is a one lady circle jerk, and she's used to doing it that way. She seems to have special inside information obtained from the Iberville Sheriff's Office that was not released to the public. The inside information is as fake as her news stories.


  

What's holding up those forensic tests?

Well, we're still waiting.

On October 7, 2014 Major Ronnie Hebert sent us a gem of a tale.:

http://theadvocate.com/news/10466523-123/evidence-shows-scott-rogers-hodgkinson

 According to Hebert's "expert" opinion, only knowing both men were shot with the same gun proved it was a murder suicide. This could not be further from the truth. At no time in the recent history of crime scene investigation has being shot by the same gun constituted a murder- suicide conclusion.....
                       
  ..... gunpowder residue and pattern do. So why report only one small aspect of gun testing and leave all the important stuff out?

 Also notice the wording Major Hebert chose to use in the press release to the Advocate. These words were chosen to stop later questions by misleading readers to believe this was cut and dry.

  Two men were unable to testify at a hearing that was convened for reasons we do not know, the Sheriff couldn't stick to one, or even two stories, so we really do not know WHO testified and who didn't. There were some statements alluding to Rogers being the target of investigation, but none of this could be confirmed. Surely some people in the Sheriff's Office were going to get their reputations sullied if a different story was revealed.